As soon as the LPL announced the ban list, the players appealed, pointing out that the official set a trap for the players

Recently, LPL professional player Acheng was officially banned for violations, but this incident did not end there. Acheng immediately posted on social media, bluntly expressing his dissatisfaction and denouncing the LPL's official handling of the situation.

This long article quickly sparked heated discussions in the e-sports circle, pushing the contradiction between the rights and interests of players and the management of the alliance to the forefront. In the post, Acheng believes that the ban is unfair, saying that he has not been given sufficient opportunities for explanation and appeal during the investigation of the incident, and the official characterization of his actions is biased.

Acheng stressed that he himself did not violate the regulations, and the official asked him to come up with evidence that he did not violate the regulations, how could there be evidence if there was no violation? This is a self-evident trap.

Acheng's speech caused a strong response in the esports community. Some fans believe he has the right to speak up for himself, pointing out that the problem of imperfect rules is a pain point that the industry needs to face, and supporters say that players who put their heart and soul into the league should be treated fairly.

Others believe that Acheng, as a professional player, should be familiar with the rules and strictly abide by them, and even if the punishment is too severe, he should deal with it in a more professional manner, rather than provoking public opinion disputes through public articles.

At present, LPL officials have not responded to Acheng's post. However, this turmoil has triggered a re-examination of the LPL's rules and management model. The rift in trust between the players and the authorities not only affects individuals, but also poses a severe test to the credibility of the event. How to balance the implementation of rules and the rights and interests of players will become an important issue in the future of league management, do you have anything to say about this?