Hello LPL viewers and League of Legends summoners, this is the World Game Exchange.
At the end of this year, the transfer period of the LPL and LCK regions has ended, and there have been many surprising plots in the transfer period of the two regions, and the most shocking thing in the LCK is the departure of Zeus players.
After Zeus's departure, the LCK also launched a series of war of words, and the real situation of his departure was the focus of discussion.
First of all, Zeus's departure was something that the T1 club did not expect, and T1 was also very dissatisfied after Zeus signed with HLE, and the boss appeared to say, the spearhead was directly pointed at the agency behind Zeus, and then the agency also came forward to speak out and gave its own version, and there was a key point in the two different versions, that is, whether the HLE side set a deadline for the transfer period.
In the version of T1, they gave Zeus an offer many times, but Zeus did not give a counter-offer, and the communication was unsuccessful many times, and then in the most critical two days, Zeus finally gave a counter-offer, but the window period was too short, Zeus released the pigeons, and then directly signed HLE, without giving T1 room for relaxation, and then communicated with HLE and was told that there was no deadline.
Zeus's statement is that the first few times T1 gave a quotation and their expected offer was too large, so they did not give a counter-offer, and the most critical two days also communicated with T1 many times, and the negotiations between the two sides broke down during the bargaining process, and the HLE side set a deadline, so they chose to sign HLE.
Because the two sides insist on their own words, netizens are also divided into two factions, and yesterday the head of HLE spoke again, the LCK dispute restarted, and the mystery about Zeus's departure once again attracted everyone's attention.
Here's the thing, HLE teamfight mentioned the signing of Zeus in an interview, and his exact words are like this: There is no idea of delaying the introduction of Choi Yu-ki, which allows us to quickly move on to Plan B or Plan C. Contrary to rumors, we have set a deadline to confirm the introduction as soon as possible.
In other words, the head of HLE did set a deadline during the transfer period, so the question is, why did the T1 boss get the statement that there was no deadline when he asked HLE, and why did HLE give an ambiguous response and did not choose to take sides after the public opinion war started.
And if HLE really set a deadline, then Zeus shouldn't have to be saddled with so much infamy when he left the team.
However, soon after the interview with the head of HLE came out, T1 boss Joe Marsh came forward to retort: the liar's worst enemy is the person with a good memory. And when releasing the news, the HLE in English was capitalized, that is, the HLE was lying, and the re-outing of the two sides caused a new dispute.
Personally, I think the key point of this matter is that HLE's various behaviors in this transfer period have caused Zeus to suffer more infamy, and we will ignore the real situation of Zeus's tugging between HLE and T1 for the time being, let's just say that HLE's approach after facing the dispute between the two parties, giving an ambiguous response, did not protect the player.
T1 asked HLE if it set a deadline, and the result was a no, so whether this is true or false, which HLE management was contacted, and whether there is any information gap.
After giving a no-reply, it is very undesirable for the two sides to choose neutrality after a war of words, and what should not be done is that after the pace of things has passed for a long time, they said in the interview that they did set a deadline, which is very speechless.
Even if T1 doesn't do so authentic during the transfer period, if you bite you HLE and give no answer, you can occupy the high point of public opinion, plus T1 has a very large number of fans around the world, and Zeus and HLE will inevitably become losers after the quarrel.