In the process of live broadcasting, Pan Hong's operation error led to the suffocation of the dog, which not only makes people question the supervision of live broadcast content and the sense of responsibility of the anchor, but also makes people think deeply about the contradiction between "entertainment first" and animal protection in the live broadcast industry.
First of all, Pan Hong, as a public figure, should bear greater social responsibility for his behavior, especially on a highly exposed platform such as live broadcast, every move will be amplified, whether it is the care of pets or the guidance of the audience, the anchor should maintain a high degree of sensitivity and caution.
Before the heat of this matter passed, a new rhythm immediately appeared, that is, the owner of a dog in the park asked to return his dog "Shenzhou", but was rejected by the staff of Pan Hong Park and asked to sign a contract.
The contract requires that after the owner brings back the dog, it is not allowed to shoot videos to attract traffic, it is not allowed to attack Pan Hong himself, and it is not allowed to receive advertisements and bring goods, which means that if you bring it back, you can only raise it as an ordinary dog, and cannot use it as a commercial tool, otherwise you will be compensated 1 million.
For this contract, the owner was reluctant to sign it, and made the matter public, and many media and relevant departments also intervened, and the staff of Pan Hong Park said that this was to prevent a lot of rhythm for Pan Hong himself.
And Pan Hong's sky-high contract follow-up also came out, the owner did not agree to sign, the park asked to take the dog in two months, the matter is still stuck in this place, the owner is unwilling to sign this matter, many netizens suspect that the owner just wants to bring back the dog to create an account to live broadcast the goods, but some people said that Pan Hong's behavior has been suspected of violating the law, and now the matter is still fermenting, do you have anything to say about this?