Dumb sister travels to Thailand, live broadcast alone at the beach late at night, bluntly said that she was a little scared but just didn't go back, recently, the well-known anchor Silly girl insisted on traveling to Thailand despite dissuasion, and broadcast live alone on the beach, admitting that she was "quite scared", but she still had no intention of leaving.
This move quickly sparked heated discussions among netizens, with many accusing her of ignoring her own safety in order to gain traffic, and even questioning whether she intended to create "danger" to attract attention.
In this context, as a public figure, Silly Girl, as a public figure, chose to go alone and broadcast live, which is indeed easy to give people the impression of "ignoring risks", and when she showed fear in the live broadcast, but still insisted on not leaving, it was inevitable that the audience would question her motives, and some people even thought that she was using the "sense of danger" to create topics in order to get higher traffic.
From another point of view, the anchor industry is already fiercely competitive, and content creation needs to constantly innovate, in recent years, many anchors have attracted audiences through extreme challenges, adventures and even risky live broadcasts, which has become a traffic routine. This is food for thought.
If she really put herself in danger for the sake of creating a gimmick, it is undoubtedly an irresponsible behavior, which not only affects personal safety, but may also send the wrong information to fans and even contribute to a bad live broadcast atmosphere.
Of course, as an adult, she has the right to decide her own itinerary, but every move of public figures will be amplified, and she will assume more social responsibilities, hoping that the girl can weigh the relationship between safety and traffic more rationally, and avoid using her own safety as a live broadcast gimmick, and also remind the audience not to easily follow similar risky behaviors, do you have anything to say about this?