Following the intense defeat against Liverpool at St James’ Park, Eddie Howe candidly admitted that Alexander Isak was the biggest factor that set Newcastle apart.
After a thrilling 2-3 defeat to Liverpool at St James’ Park, coach Eddie Howe showed clear disappointment. Yet beyond the frustration of losing, he emphasized the crucial role of Alexander Isak, the striker who has become the focal point of the transfer window.
Isak, who has been approached by Liverpool with a £110 million offer, currently has an uncertain future. When asked about the possibility of the Swedish forward leaving, Howe was straightforward: “Honestly, I don’t know where Isak is at the moment. What we want is clarity so the team can move forward. Newcastle needs a clear direction as we are still early in the season and every result matters.”
Coach Eddie Howe admits Newcastle struggles without Isak (Image: GOAL)
Howe acknowledged that Isak’s quality is irreplaceable in Newcastle’s current lineup: “He made a difference in both previous matches. Isak’s talent and composure give us moments of brilliance. That’s what any top club needs to sustain success.”
The English manager also confirmed Newcastle will not sell Isak unless they find two quality strikers as replacements. However, targets like Yoane Wisse (Brentford) and Jorgen Strand Larsen (Wolves) have not materialized, worsening the situation.
Eddie Howe also stated he won’t sell Isak without securing a replacement striker (Image: GOAL)
Nevertheless, Howe firmly places Isak at the heart of his tactical plans: “This team needs him. We may be disappointed by the results, but today’s performance proved how vital every link is. Isak is the difference, the player who can change the course of a match. Without him, Newcastle loses a significant advantage.”
As the transfer window nears its close, clarity on Isak’s future is not only a transfer issue but a key factor for Newcastle to set their season goals. For Eddie Howe, the 26-year-old striker is more than just a player — he is the fiery spirit of the “Magpies” attack.