In the 24th round of the Chinese Super League, Chengdu Rongcheng played away against Wuhan Three Towns, and Wei Shihao came on as a substitute in the second half. Facing his old boss, Wei Shihao became the focus of the game, but not because of how good he was on the field, but because of a rude foul. In the 63rd minute of the game, Wei Shihao kicked down Deng Hanwen from behind and was directly shown a red card by the referee. For a while, the spearhead was pointed at Wei Shihao, thinking that he hurt the team again because he couldn't control his temper.

Wei Shihao also apologized on social media after the game, and the incident would have gradually subsided. But a little earlier, a penalty statement from the Football Association came out, which once again pushed Wei Shihao into the whirlpool of public opinion. The content of the ticket is: Wei Shihao committed violent acts, kicked the opposing player from behind with his foot, suspended for 4 games, and fined 40,000 yuan.

As soon as the statement came out, fans began to discuss it. The party Wei Shihao also added "a fire" on social media, and he posted a moving picture of Cressan kicking down Zhu Chenjie from behind in the 18th round of Shandong Taishan vs. Shanghai Shenhua. Although there is no accompanying text, the outside world knows what he wants to express, that is, he is questioning the different standards of punishment.

After that, many netizens came to Wei Shihao's social media to leave messages, mainly there were two opinions, some people thought that Wei Shihao should admit his mistake, and some people thought that the Football Association's punishment was double standard.

Judging from the animated picture, Cressan not only kicked down Zhu Chenjie, but also pushed down Gao Tianyi. It all happened under the referee's nose, and in the end Cressan was sent off for a second yellow card, and there was no additional penalty after that.

As the saying goes, "don't suffer from few, suffer from unevenness", and we often hear the keyword "double standard". Different people have different opinions on this topic. Some support Mr. Wei's views, while others scoff. For example, reporter Xiao Yun wrote on social media: "Wei Shihao was chased and punished, there is nothing to say. It's normal for players to do something wrong, to be reprimanded, to apologize. However, the photos posted in response to the players do give people the feeling of 'punishment double standards', which needs to be explained by the Football Association. There is nothing wrong with maintaining the style and discipline of the race, but only the handling and punishment are fair and just, so as to convince the public! ”

However, some people believe that the punishment is too heavy because Wei Shihao has repeatedly refused to change his ways, and he has already committed many violent acts before, so the punishment is increased. Cressan was clearly wrong with the ball and was a first offense, so there was no additional penalty.

And the clearest and most convincing explanation is media person Pan Weili. He mainly interpreted it from the perspective of disciplinary principles, first of all, Cressan and Zhu Chenjie's scramble near the midfield was identified as a ball scramble with excessive movements. When Wei Shihao kicked down Deng Hanwen, it was determined that the ball had gone out of the bottom line, which was a retaliatory action in the state of a dead ball. In addition, Article 48 of the Football Association's disciplinary guidelines also includes "repeated disciplinary violations" and "causing a bad social impact", both of which Wei Shihao meets.

Indeed, the rules state in black and white that violations of discipline occur when the game is stopped or without the ball, and should be punished heavily. Moreover, Wei Shihao's violent behavior is not the first time, it is a repeated refusal, and it also meets the criteria for heavier punishment.

Therefore, since the punishment has come out, Wei Shihao should seriously reflect and strive for similar behavior not to happen again, instead of choosing to protest silently, this attitude may also be the fundamental reason for his repeated teachings.