Recently, the celebrity Stubbs once again mentioned the Sinner doping incident on the show, and some of his views have caused heated discussions among many fans.

During last year's Cincinnati tournament, the Sinner doping scandal was unveiled, causing an uproar. With the advent of a dozen pages of report, there was a polarization of attitudes: some believed that the procedure was just and the trial was reasonable, and that Sinner was innocent. Others believe that the secret suspensions and double standards enjoyed by Sinner in the case raise questions about the fairness of the adjudication body. At the end of the year, the Court of Arbitration for Sport confirmed at the end of the CAS that the WADA World Anti-Doping Agency had sued Sinner, the International Tennis Integrity Agency, and the International Tennis Federation (ITF), and the case took a turn for the worse, and the Sinner case is now scheduled to be heard behind closed doors on April 16 and 17. Until then, Sinner will be able to play normally. However, after this hearing, whether Sinner will be banned has become the focus of heated discussions.

Stubbs said of the Sinner case on the show: "The way WADA handled this is nothing short of scandalous. How is it possible that ITIA tells you that you are not guilty, but WADA voices its opinion on the same issue months later? ”

She further said, "We all want him to pay for it because his team did stupid things, but we won't know the results until April." Are you kidding? Since he was declared positive, he has played two majors and won two titles. Does WADA really think this scenario is credible? Is this a good idea? I think they're going to ban him, but if he can continue to play for a while, it will give tennis a very bad image. ”

In this regard, some fans said, "Sinner can't be banned!" If it could, then it would have happened a long time ago, in Italy, within the ATP, they just wanted time to resolve everything, let time digest the dissatisfaction of a lot of people about it, and then in the end, it would have been gone. Another fan said, "This is ridiculous! It's a battle between the two bodies, and because WADA is unhappy, the case needs to be reopened, but what happened in the first place? Didn't they agree at the beginning? ”

In addition, it is worth mentioning that this is not the first time that Stubbs has spoken out about the Sinner case, and she has previously commented on Halep's dissatisfaction with the Sinner and Swiatek cases. At the time, she said, "I think there's so much back and forth in the back and forth, and one of them is, 'Oh, here's preferential treatment, like Sinner.'" As the world No. 1 player, he was given preferential treatment, and Swiatek was given preferential treatment because of her ranking. Listen, some of them may be true because they all have money, they all have lawyers, they all have a team that can support them, and they can get to the bottom of it very quickly compared to other things. I think the difference between them and Halep with the same thing, with plenty of money and resources, is that it took her a long time to figure out where the pollution was coming from, and that's part of the problem she faced. ”

However, from the current point of view, Sinner's case is still very complicated, and the outside world is also very concerned about it, will Sinner be banned? In a previous interview, the CEO of the International Tennis Integrity Agency explained that according to the relevant regulations, if the test results show that Sinner has taken illegal drugs, then the starting point of the ban is four years. If it can be proven that it was not intentional, then the penalty will be reduced to two years. In Swiatek's case, it was proven that he was contaminated with drugs, but Sinner's case was complicated by the fact that his physiotherapist had used a questionable product containing stimulants on his fingers. The positive Sinner test result was not due to a contaminated drug. Therefore, the ban period is 1-2 years.(Source: Tennis Home Author: Lu Xiaotian)